Mongol: The Rise of Genghis Khan [Blu-ray]

Mongol: The Rise of Genghis Khan [Blu-ray]

Category: (DVD)

28 new, starting at $7.72

10 used, starting at $7.73

Buy Now

Editorial Reviews

Bluray Disc

First entry in a proposed trilogy, Mongol vividly captures the beauty and brutality of ancient Mongolia. Beginning in 1172 and ending in 1206, Sergei Bodrov's Oscar-nominated epic presents future conqueror Ghengis Khan as more lover--and fighter--than diplomat. Against his father Esegui's wishes, nine-year-old Temudjin chooses his own bride, whom he marries in the years to come. Hopes for the future, however, turns to thoughts of vengeance when the clan forsakes the boy upon Esegui's death. While Temudjin (now played by Zatoichi’s Tadanobu Asano, a quietly commanding presence) makes his way in a cruel world, turncoat Targutai (Amadu Mamadakov) becomes the new khan. When an opposing clan kidnaps Temudjin’s wife, Börte (Khulan Chuluun), he eventually retrieves her, but betrays blood brother Jamukha (Sun Honglei, Seven Swords) in the process, leading to further enslavement and more Kurasawa-style slicing and dicing. Throughout his travails, Temudjin comes to believe that Mongols must unite to share the same language, culture, and set of values. Sustained by his faith in the god Tengri and the devotion of Börte, Temudjin sets out to wrest control of Mongolia from Jamukha and his women and children-killing hordes. Except for an over-reliance on CGI during the climactic battle sequence, Mongol equals the scope and grandeur of historical predecessors, like Braveheart and Hero. If much of the cast is Chinese and Japanese, Bodrov, who directed Prisoner of the Mountains, conjures up authenticity through detailed costumes, Mongolian dialogue, and remote Central Asian locations. --Kathleen C. Fennessy

Customer Reviews

the untold story of the rise of Genghis Khan

Reviewed by falcon, 2010-03-04

this is the second film about Genghis Khan i have viewed.the other one is entitled(the English translation) Genghis Khan: to the Ends of the Earth and Sea.i enjoyed that one.i also liked this movie,although they are two very different movies.this one is much more story driven.there is lots more dialogue and slower moments.most of the central characters are the same,but the circumstances involving how they meet are changed somewhat.there are also some characters that are not in the previous movie.visually,this movie looks great,and the music is haunting.the acting,once again is good.there is no option for English dubbing on the disc,but there are Spanish and English subtitles.i can't say i enjoyed this movie quite as much as the other Genghis Khan movie,although i may have to watch it again,and my opinion could change.regardless,it's a very well done film.4/5

Best treatment to date

Reviewed by B. Davies, 2010-03-02

This is actually the most "accurate" docudrama on Genghis Khan, if you keep two considerations in mind: 1) it views Temujin (future Chinghis Khan) from a Mongol perspective, and therefore treats him as a heroic statebuilder, and 2) the narrative is based on the Secret History of the Mongols (c. 1240), which mixes dynastic history with a little Mongol mythology (the protection by the white wolf, the storm which gives Temujin victory over Jamuga). Bodrov takes only a few liberties with the Secret History narrative, mostly in leaving out the character of Toghril Khan in order to make the story line easier to follow; some events involving Toghril are attributed to Jamuga. Temujin's captivity in the Tanggut Kingdom is speculation, but several historians have followed this same speculation in trying to fill in some missing years in Temujin's history.

This is a far more convincing and dramatically compelling treatment of Chinghis Khan's life than the Hollywood versions starring John Wayne and Omar Sharif.

One of the great strengths of this film is its sense of place. It really does convey the vastness and beauty of the steppe. But it also recognizes that not all the "Mongolian" tribes were steppe-dwellers practicing pastoral nomadism.

It also makes far more sense in explaining the origins of the Mongol Empire. The Empire was not a grand vision pursued by Chinghis Khan from his youth: it was an accident, an improvisation emerging from his battle just to stay alive, maintain the loyalty of his retinue, and reclaim his position in his tribe.

Ricardo Motelban Nowhere in This Movie..

Reviewed by Michael Cavenaugh, 2010-03-02

What a great movie, and pretty accurate to boot. This makes the second subtitled movie that I have seen where I was engrossed. Who would have thunk it?

A new epic that pleasantly surprised

Reviewed by Adam L. Cobden, 2010-02-21

I want to begin by mentioning that this is a movie and not a documentary. Therefore, I am reviewing it as entertainment and not an attempt at historical re-creation. I mention this because many people have commented about historical errors in the movie which I find ridiculous because even the foremost expert on Genghis Khan doesn't know precisely how his life unfolded and, once again, this is not a documentary. So, we will move past that altogether.

I like movies such as Braveheart, Gladiator, Troy, and Kingdom of Heaven. All big-time movies with big-time actors and budgets. I feel that Mongol fits well into the genre and I enjoyed it as much as any of the aforementioned movies. To echo what others have said, it is as well shot, has as equally impressive costuming, and production values as any of the movies mentioned earlier. Mongol also has heart in the sense that it portrays many instances of overcoming struggle and does it honorably.

This is an absolute steal for $10 on blu-ray. Best buy for me in a year, at least.

disjointed film fictionalizes Genghis Khan's life

Reviewed by Loren Woirhaye, 2010-02-18

This film is far too much constructed as entertainment to
be taken seriously if you've read any biography of
Genghis Khan.

At times the films gets downright silly, plotwise but it
is ravishingly photographed with exotic grandeur.

Probably the film had money problems and took a long
time to shoot, but the transient cast makes it
difficult to follow. Since the film is subtitled it's
a little tough for me to say whether the dialog is
good or not, but from a narrative continuity point
of view the film is messy. I know for some viewers
a comprehensible story isn't too important, and I've
watched enough Asian-made films to understand that
cultural differences may account for some of the
"huh?" moments in the film... to some people this
film's storyline may make perfect sense, but I found
it uneven and confusing.